According to the Piliavin study, which type of victim received 100% help without a model?

The correct answer is that the cane victim received 100% help without a model in the Piliavin study, which is significant in understanding how the nature of the victim affects bystander intervention. This study focused on the dynamics of helping behavior in emergency situations, observing how a victim's characteristics influenced whether people offered assistance.

In the case of the cane victim, who appeared to be physically disabled, the urgency for intervention was heightened. Bystanders were likely to perceive this scenario as more pressing, activating empathy and prompting immediate action. The limp and cane clearly indicated that this person needed help, which could elicit a strong moral response from observers. The finding emphasizes the role of perceived vulnerability in attracting assistance from bystanders.

This contrasts with other types of victims in the study, such as the drunk victim, who may not have been viewed with the same urgency or as deserving of help due to societal attitudes associated with alcohol use. The context and characteristics of the victims played a crucial role in determining the likelihood of receiving help, highlighting the complexities of human social behavior in emergency situations.